Facebook Adds Video Chat and the World Collectively Responds With “So What?”

A few years ago I did something really radical.

I used Facebook to video chat with my friends.

Okay to clarify, I wasn’t actually using Facebook itself, but a plugin called Tokbox that embedded a video chat client into an application that ran on Facebook. It was cool! It was rad! It…ran out of novelty after a few weeks and I never used it again.

That’s not to say video chat is a poor means of integration, quite the contrary, and I believe it does have its uses. But a 1 to 1 chat client while Facebook’s newest competitor is rolling out group chat is simply not going to cut the mustard. Even more so, a chat client that lacks the ubiquity of Facebook’s reach – namely lack of mobile integration – makes, in my opinion, Facebook look unprepared. This was supposed to be a day celebrated through innovation and instead Facebook felt more slow and plodding and less methodical.

My quick POV? We are no longer synchronous communicators. We’re asynchronous. It’s why we prefer texting over talking. It’s the last luxury of time we have left – to think before we speak. And as such, like Tokbox, I simply don’t believe video chat is the (in the words of Zuck) “super awesome” killer feature the world’s been waiting for.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Facebook Adds Video Chat and the World Collectively Responds With “So What?””

  1. Agreed. This is one thing I love about Twitter – the asynchronous nature of it. Read/respond in your own time. And I’ve never been a fan of Facebook chat – I’ve left it turned off for years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s